Sunday, March 25, 2012
Database Size Limitation of SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
Server 2000 Personal Edition. Just like the MSDE, the data file size cannot
be greater than 2GB (From memory) ?No there is no limitation.
But there is limitation on RAM usage
Database Size Limitation of SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
Server 2000 Personal Edition. Just like the MSDE, the data file size cannot
be greater than 2GB (From memory) ?
No there is no limitation.
But there is limitation on RAM usage
Database Size Limitation of SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
Server 2000 Personal Edition. Just like the MSDE, the data file size cannot
be greater than 2GB (From memory) ?No there is no limitation.
But there is limitation on RAM usage
Database size for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
it 2GB ?
Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server 2000
and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005 Express
on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
Your advice is sought.
ThanksPeter
> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
> Is it 2GB ?
No, it is limited by the disk's capacity
> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
Yes, 4GB
> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
SQL Server 2005 Express is coming along with VS2005 installation.
You can download SQL Server 2005 Express and burn out to DVD /CD... .
"Peter" <Peter@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:esv3UGi4GHA.3396@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
> Is it 2GB ?
> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
> Your advice is sought.
> Thanks
>|||Dear Uri,
Thank you for your advice.
Peter
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%234uAmOj4GHA.4196@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Peter
> No, it is limited by the disk's capacity
>
> Yes, 4GB
>
> SQL Server 2005 Express is coming along with VS2005 installation.
> You can download SQL Server 2005 Express and burn out to DVD /CD... .
>
> "Peter" <Peter@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:esv3UGi4GHA.3396@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>sql
Database size for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
it 2GB ?
Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server 2000
and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005 Express
on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
Your advice is sought.
Thanks
Peter
> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
> Is it 2GB ?
No, it is limited by the disk's capacity
> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
Yes, 4GB
> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
SQL Server 2005 Express is coming along with VS2005 installation.
You can download SQL Server 2005 Express and burn out to DVD /CD... .
"Peter" <Peter@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:esv3UGi4GHA.3396@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
> Is it 2GB ?
> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
> Your advice is sought.
> Thanks
>
|||Dear Uri,
Thank you for your advice.
Peter
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%234uAmOj4GHA.4196@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Peter
> No, it is limited by the disk's capacity
>
> Yes, 4GB
>
> SQL Server 2005 Express is coming along with VS2005 installation.
> You can download SQL Server 2005 Express and burn out to DVD /CD... .
>
> "Peter" <Peter@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:esv3UGi4GHA.3396@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
Database size for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
it 2GB ?
Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server 2000
and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005 Express
on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
Your advice is sought.
ThanksPeter
> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
> Is it 2GB ?
No, it is limited by the disk's capacity
> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
Yes, 4GB
> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
SQL Server 2005 Express is coming along with VS2005 installation.
You can download SQL Server 2005 Express and burn out to DVD /CD... .
"Peter" <Peter@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:esv3UGi4GHA.3396@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
> Is it 2GB ?
> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
> Your advice is sought.
> Thanks
>|||Dear Uri,
Thank you for your advice.
Peter
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%234uAmOj4GHA.4196@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Peter
>> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
>> Is it 2GB ?
> No, it is limited by the disk's capacity
>> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
> Yes, 4GB
>> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
>> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
>> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
> SQL Server 2005 Express is coming along with VS2005 installation.
> You can download SQL Server 2005 Express and burn out to DVD /CD... .
>
> "Peter" <Peter@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:esv3UGi4GHA.3396@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition ?
>> Is it 2GB ?
>> Also, is there any database size limit for SQL Server 2005 Express ?
>> From end user point of view, is there any difference between SQL Server
>> 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express ? Is it possible to get SQL Server 2005
>> Express on CD ROM instead of downloading from the Web ?
>> Your advice is sought.
>> Thanks
>
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Database size
I would like to ask if 4 GB (maximum for SQL Server 2005 Express edition ) of database size means size of data file + log file size
Thanks
It is datafile size only.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345154.aspx - check Engine Specifications
HTH!
Database size
Hi, i'm using SQL Server 2005 Express Edition with advance services. Created a small database with 21 tables and 66 simple stored procedures. The database should not take up huge data in a short period of time. However, when i right click and check out the Database Properties, i noticed that the database size has grown to 1700 MB and available space is only about 0.9 MB. But when i locate the respective .mdf and .ldf file file, the file size of mdf is only about 4000KB and ldf file is about 1,650,000 KB.
I understand that SQL Server Express Edition allows up to 4GB of data file for each database created. But i'm puzzled and would like to know what is actually meant by the databse size and available space that i see via Database Properties. It seems worrying. Can anyone guide me? Thx in advance.
It sounds like your database is running in Full Recovery Model, and your transaction log (the ldf file) is growing. If so, you need to periodically back up your transaction log, which will allow it to release space internally. Then you will need to shrink the transaction log file to get the space back externally.
If you are running in Simple Recovery Model, then you may have a problem with an open transaction.
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Database Service Won't Start
database is Enterprise Edition and another two instances are Developer
Editions. They have been running fine until recently.
We can start ANY ONE instance from the EM, only ONE. None of any other
services can be started anymore. Not even SQL Agent. We have to start
rest of other database services and sql agent from command line.
When we try to connect the SQL Server or Agent from the EM, we got
"Error 1053 - (The service did not respond to the start or control
request in a timely fashion) occured while performing this service
operation on the MSSQL service."
Thought maybe some corrpution to currnet databases, DLL etc. Installed
another new instance on the server, got the same error message.
Verified Microsoft KB article 322140, does not seem apply to us.
Any opinion is appreciated.Hi,
What you could do is first backup all the databases currently running on your
server.
1) Please never install Enterprise Edition and Developer Edition on the Same
Drive.
2) Install both of them on separate Drives.
3) Setup the Client and Server Tools for only the Enterprise Edition.
4) And when installing the Developer Editions, install only the Server and
not the client tools.
I faced a similar problem when I installed SQL Server 2000 and SQL server
2005 express on the same drive.
So when I installed it on separate drives, no problems faced yet :)
Hope this helps :)
--
Best Regards
Anil Mahadev
http://anilm001.myfreewebs.net/index2.php
http://www.db2india.org
Message posted via SQLMonster.com
http://www.sqlmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/sql-server/200609/1|||Thanks for your response.
But it works fine before, until 2 weeks ago. Now I can start them from
command line.
Thanks.
DB2DOTNETCZAR via SQLMonster.com wrote:
> Hi,
> What you could do is first backup all the databases currently running on your
> server.
> 1) Please never install Enterprise Edition and Developer Edition on the Same
> Drive.
> 2) Install both of them on separate Drives.
> 3) Setup the Client and Server Tools for only the Enterprise Edition.
> 4) And when installing the Developer Editions, install only the Server and
> not the client tools.
> I faced a similar problem when I installed SQL Server 2000 and SQL server
> 2005 express on the same drive.
> So when I installed it on separate drives, no problems faced yet :)
> Hope this helps :)
> --
> Best Regards
> Anil Mahadev
> http://anilm001.myfreewebs.net/index2.php
> http://www.db2india.org
> Message posted via SQLMonster.com
> http://www.sqlmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/sql-server/200609/1
Database Service Won't Start
database is Enterprise Edition and another two instances are Developer
Editions. They have been running fine until recently.
We can start ANY ONE instance from the EM, only ONE. None of any other
services can be started anymore. Not even SQL Agent. We have to start
rest of other database services and sql agent from command line.
When we try to connect the SQL Server or Agent from the EM, we got
"Error 1053 - (The service did not respond to the start or control
request in a timely fashion) occured while performing this service
operation on the MSSQL service."
Thought maybe some corrpution to currnet databases, DLL etc. Installed
another new instance on the server, got the same error message.
Verified Microsoft KB article 322140, does not seem apply to us.
Any opinion is appreciated.Hi,
What you could do is first backup all the databases currently running on you
r
server.
1) Please never install Enterprise Edition and Developer Edition on the Same
Drive.
2) Install both of them on separate Drives.
3) Setup the Client and Server Tools for only the Enterprise Edition.
4) And when installing the Developer Editions, install only the Server and
not the client tools.
I faced a similar problem when I installed SQL Server 2000 and SQL server
2005 express on the same drive.
So when I installed it on separate drives, no problems faced yet
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Anil Mahadev
http://anilm001.myfreewebs.net/index2.php
http://www.db2india.org
Message posted via droptable.com
http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forum...server/200609/1|||Thanks for your response.
But it works fine before, until 2 weeks ago. Now I can start them from
command line.
Thanks.
DB2DOTNETCZAR via droptable.com wrote:
> Hi,
> What you could do is first backup all the databases currently running on y
our
> server.
> 1) Please never install Enterprise Edition and Developer Edition on the Sa
me
> Drive.
> 2) Install both of them on separate Drives.
> 3) Setup the Client and Server Tools for only the Enterprise Edition.
> 4) And when installing the Developer Editions, install only the Server and
> not the client tools.
> I faced a similar problem when I installed SQL Server 2000 and SQL server
> 2005 express on the same drive.
> So when I installed it on separate drives, no problems faced yet
> Hope this helps
> --
> Best Regards
> Anil Mahadev
> http://anilm001.myfreewebs.net/index2.php
> http://www.db2india.org
> Message posted via droptable.com
> http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forum...server/200609/1
Database Service Won't Start
database is Enterprise Edition and another two instances are Developer
Editions. They have been running fine until recently.
We can start ANY ONE instance from the EM, only ONE. None of any other
services can be started anymore. Not even SQL Agent. We have to start
rest of other database services and sql agent from command line.
When we try to connect the SQL Server or Agent from the EM, we got
"Error 1053 - (The service did not respond to the start or control
request in a timely fashion) occured while performing this service
operation on the MSSQL service."
Thought maybe some corrpution to currnet databases, DLL etc. Installed
another new instance on the server, got the same error message.
Verified Microsoft KB article 322140, does not seem apply to us.
Any opinion is appreciated.
Hi,
What you could do is first backup all the databases currently running on your
server.
1) Please never install Enterprise Edition and Developer Edition on the Same
Drive.
2) Install both of them on separate Drives.
3) Setup the Client and Server Tools for only the Enterprise Edition.
4) And when installing the Developer Editions, install only the Server and
not the client tools.
I faced a similar problem when I installed SQL Server 2000 and SQL server
2005 express on the same drive.
So when I installed it on separate drives, no problems faced yet
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Anil Mahadev
http://anilm001.myfreewebs.net/index2.php
http://www.db2india.org
Message posted via droptable.com
http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums...erver/200609/1
|||Thanks for your response.
But it works fine before, until 2 weeks ago. Now I can start them from
command line.
Thanks.
DB2DOTNETCZAR via droptable.com wrote:
> Hi,
> What you could do is first backup all the databases currently running on your
> server.
> 1) Please never install Enterprise Edition and Developer Edition on the Same
> Drive.
> 2) Install both of them on separate Drives.
> 3) Setup the Client and Server Tools for only the Enterprise Edition.
> 4) And when installing the Developer Editions, install only the Server and
> not the client tools.
> I faced a similar problem when I installed SQL Server 2000 and SQL server
> 2005 express on the same drive.
> So when I installed it on separate drives, no problems faced yet
> Hope this helps
> --
> Best Regards
> Anil Mahadev
> http://anilm001.myfreewebs.net/index2.php
> http://www.db2india.org
> Message posted via droptable.com
> http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums...erver/200609/1
Database server layout
Being small, we have only one database server that serves our need (SQL
2000 Enterprise Edition). We never had any replication or mirroring.
Now we will be installing SQL 2005.
I was asked to look into the best way of creating a good database
server so that we will not have any downtime.
At the present if we need to stop/restart or something goes wrong with
the server, then we loose many working hours sometimes even a few days.
Could you please point me the right direction (articles, web link) so
that I can see an example of good database server layout?
I do appreciate your help.
Thanks a million in advance.
Best regards,
MamunHi Mamun
I would suggest the best and most cost effective solution with the lease
amount of administrative effort would have to be mirroring. THe SQL Native
Client monitors the server status and fails over automatically for you and
your applications can continue working without have to re-establish
connection again of having to wait for failovers to complete. We tested
mirroring extensively and achieved failover in 5 sec, MS claim u can be up
and running on the mirror instance in 3 sec.
have a look at it, i'm sure it would fulfill all your needs
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/dbmirror.mspx
--
http://www.sqlserver.co.za
"mamun_ah@.hotmail.com" wrote:
> Hi All,
> Being small, we have only one database server that serves our need (SQL
> 2000 Enterprise Edition). We never had any replication or mirroring.
> Now we will be installing SQL 2005.
> I was asked to look into the best way of creating a good database
> server so that we will not have any downtime.
> At the present if we need to stop/restart or something goes wrong with
> the server, then we loose many working hours sometimes even a few days.
>
> Could you please point me the right direction (articles, web link) so
> that I can see an example of good database server layout?
> I do appreciate your help.
> Thanks a million in advance.
> Best regards,
> Mamun
>
Database server layout
Being small, we have only one database server that serves our need (SQL
2000 Enterprise Edition). We never had any replication or mirroring.
Now we will be installing SQL 2005.
I was asked to look into the best way of creating a good database
server so that we will not have any downtime.
At the present if we need to stop/restart or something goes wrong with
the server, then we loose many working hours sometimes even a few days.
Could you please point me the right direction (articles, web link) so
that I can see an example of good database server layout?
I do appreciate your help.
Thanks a million in advance.
Best regards,
MamunHi Mamun
I would suggest the best and most cost effective solution with the lease
amount of administrative effort would have to be mirroring. THe SQL Native
Client monitors the server status and fails over automatically for you and
your applications can continue working without have to re-establish
connection again of having to wait for failovers to complete. We tested
mirroring extensively and achieved failover in 5 sec, MS claim u can be up
and running on the mirror instance in 3 sec.
have a look at it, i'm sure it would fulfill all your needs
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pr...5/dbmirror.mspx
http://www.sqlserver.co.za
"mamun_ah@.hotmail.com" wrote:
> Hi All,
> Being small, we have only one database server that serves our need (SQL
> 2000 Enterprise Edition). We never had any replication or mirroring.
> Now we will be installing SQL 2005.
> I was asked to look into the best way of creating a good database
> server so that we will not have any downtime.
> At the present if we need to stop/restart or something goes wrong with
> the server, then we loose many working hours sometimes even a few days.
>
> Could you please point me the right direction (articles, web link) so
> that I can see an example of good database server layout?
> I do appreciate your help.
> Thanks a million in advance.
> Best regards,
> Mamun
>
Database server layout
Being small, we have only one database server that serves our need (SQL
2000 Enterprise Edition). We never had any replication or mirroring.
Now we will be installing SQL 2005.
I was asked to look into the best way of creating a good database
server so that we will not have any downtime.
At the present if we need to stop/restart or something goes wrong with
the server, then we loose many working hours sometimes even a few days.
Could you please point me the right direction (articles, web link) so
that I can see an example of good database server layout?
I do appreciate your help.
Thanks a million in advance.
Best regards,
Mamun
Hi Mamun
I would suggest the best and most cost effective solution with the lease
amount of administrative effort would have to be mirroring. THe SQL Native
Client monitors the server status and fails over automatically for you and
your applications can continue working without have to re-establish
connection again of having to wait for failovers to complete. We tested
mirroring extensively and achieved failover in 5 sec, MS claim u can be up
and running on the mirror instance in 3 sec.
have a look at it, i'm sure it would fulfill all your needs
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../dbmirror.mspx
http://www.sqlserver.co.za
"mamun_ah@.hotmail.com" wrote:
> Hi All,
> Being small, we have only one database server that serves our need (SQL
> 2000 Enterprise Edition). We never had any replication or mirroring.
> Now we will be installing SQL 2005.
> I was asked to look into the best way of creating a good database
> server so that we will not have any downtime.
> At the present if we need to stop/restart or something goes wrong with
> the server, then we loose many working hours sometimes even a few days.
>
> Could you please point me the right direction (articles, web link) so
> that I can see an example of good database server layout?
> I do appreciate your help.
> Thanks a million in advance.
> Best regards,
> Mamun
>
sql
Monday, March 19, 2012
Database schema comparison
Hello all. I am using Sql Compact Edition for a small standalone application, I create and build the initial database schema on initial startup. What I am looking for is a way to upgrade the software and on initial startup of the new version, I would like it to compare the existing database with a new schema and then update the database based on the difference. This way I can have a version that will update the database without me having to know what version it is to begin with. Is there a way to do this or am I asking too much?
Thank you,
Jim
This is something you will have to code yourself, however the key to doing this is to tap into the INFORMATION_SCHEMA views in SQL Compact Edition.
You can get metadata about all aspects of the schema of a SQL CE/SQL Mobile database using this view and then make determinations about old vs new schema as you compare two database versions. Books Online covers the INFORMATION_SCHEMA view and what it contains.
Regards,
Darren Shaffer
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Database Runtime
now i want to distribute this software to other cleints.
I have created a setup which includes all the components required for the run time of the software but i dont know how to include the sql server database in it.
as i know that i have created access based software i used to include the database file in the setup and it would work but in the case of sql server i dont know how to do it .
is there any runtime of sql server which needs to be downloaded or any other way out.SQL Server Express is free of charge.|||I just seached information on sql server expres edition. it Is quite good but what if i need my application to run on network.
is it possible in sql server express edition to run my application on network.|||and another thing as i ve created my application in sql server enterprise manager is it possible to convert my database in sql server express edition|||See here for the differncies between Express and Enterprise editions
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Database resource won't start after changing cluster subnet
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP1. I changed the subnet mask
of my public network config, as well as the MCS virtual subnet and two
database resource subnets (all are using the same subnet). DNS is
correctly resolving to the IP addresses for all cluster resources. I
have two databases on this cluster. After changing the subnet, the
first one starts correctly on both nodes. The second one fails to
start at the SQL Server resource on node 1, but starts correctly on
node 2. I've included the three major application log errors below.
Before I start troubleshooting any further, I'm looking for any
suggestions. Does anyone know if running the SQL Server installation
advanced options mode would make any difference? Could a machine
reboot be necessary?
Type: Error
User: N/A
Source: MSSQL$LCCSQLINST1
Category: (3)
Event ID: 17052
Description:
[sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
=======================================
Type: Error
User: N/A
Source: MSSQL$LCCSQLINST1
Category: (3)
Event ID: 17052
Description:
[sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 08001; native error = 11;
message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server
Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
=======================================
Type: Error
User: N/A
Source: MSSQL$LCCSQLINST1
Category: (3)
Event ID: 17052
Description:
[sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 01000; native error = 35;
message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server
Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
=======================================
Thanks,
Curt
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244980/en-us
There's a section in there on how to change the subnet for the resources on
a SQL Server 2000 failover cluster configuration.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Curtis Morrison" <curtmorrison@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174920700.449721.209260@.l77g2000hsb.googlegr oups.com...
> I'm running a SQL Server 2000 SP4 2-node active/acitve cluster on
> Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP1. I changed the subnet mask
> of my public network config, as well as the MCS virtual subnet and two
> database resource subnets (all are using the same subnet). DNS is
> correctly resolving to the IP addresses for all cluster resources. I
> have two databases on this cluster. After changing the subnet, the
> first one starts correctly on both nodes. The second one fails to
> start at the SQL Server resource on node 1, but starts correctly on
> node 2. I've included the three major application log errors below.
> Before I start troubleshooting any further, I'm looking for any
> suggestions. Does anyone know if running the SQL Server installation
> advanced options mode would make any difference? Could a machine
> reboot be necessary?
> Type: Error
> User: N/A
> Source: MSSQL$LCCSQLINST1
> Category: (3)
> Event ID: 17052
> Description:
> [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
> =======================================
> Type: Error
> User: N/A
> Source: MSSQL$LCCSQLINST1
> Category: (3)
> Event ID: 17052
> Description:
> [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 08001; native error = 11;
> message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server
> Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
> =======================================
> Type: Error
> User: N/A
> Source: MSSQL$LCCSQLINST1
> Category: (3)
> Event ID: 17052
> Description:
> [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 01000; native error = 35;
> message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server
> Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
> =======================================
> Thanks,
> Curt
>