After restoring my old transaction logs, the database
showing a status: 'Loading'. The database status still
remain 'Loading' even after 3 days.
Is there anyway I can stop the loading and will it cause
any problem to my data?Perhaps the last log was restored with NORECOVERY. In this case, you
can recover the database with the command below. This will not
introduce any data problems.
RESTORE DATABASE MyDatabase
WITH RECOVERY
--
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
--
SQL FAQ links (courtesy Neil Pike):
http://www.ntfaq.com/Articles/Index.cfm?DepartmentID=800
http://www.sqlserverfaq.com
http://www.mssqlserver.com/faq
--
"TEO" <teo.yongjiew@.eonbank.com.my> wrote in message
news:067501c3a80b$73cf54e0$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
> After restoring my old transaction logs, the database
> showing a status: 'Loading'. The database status still
> remain 'Loading' even after 3 days.
> Is there anyway I can stop the loading and will it cause
> any problem to my data?sql
Showing posts with label loading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label loading. Show all posts
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Database Status = Loading
A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
avoid this scenario?
-SJHi
Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
is any additional information in them?
It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
John
"SJ" wrote:
> A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups
on
> a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore ha
s
> completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran t
he
> command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an erro
r
> basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restor
e
> did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how t
o
> avoid this scenario?
> --
> -SJ|||Here is the error:
File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
log.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
successfully."
-SJ
"John Bell" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi
> Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if the
re
> is any additional information in them?
> It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> John
> "SJ" wrote:
>|||Hi SJ
Check out:
http://groups.google.com/group/micr...27357de5278e8bd
John
"SJ" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Here is the error:
> File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or fi
le
> restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
> log.
> Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
> Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
> successfully."
> -SJ
> "John Bell" wrote:
>
a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
avoid this scenario?
-SJHi
Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
is any additional information in them?
It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
John
"SJ" wrote:
> A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups
on
> a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore ha
s
> completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran t
he
> command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an erro
r
> basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restor
e
> did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how t
o
> avoid this scenario?
> --
> -SJ|||Here is the error:
File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
log.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
successfully."
-SJ
"John Bell" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi
> Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if the
re
> is any additional information in them?
> It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> John
> "SJ" wrote:
>|||Hi SJ
Check out:
http://groups.google.com/group/micr...27357de5278e8bd
John
"SJ" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Here is the error:
> File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or fi
le
> restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
> log.
> Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
> Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
> successfully."
> -SJ
> "John Bell" wrote:
>
Database Status = Loading
A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
avoid this scenario?
-SJ
Hi
Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
is any additional information in them?
It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
John
"SJ" wrote:
> A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> avoid this scenario?
> --
> -SJ
|||Here is the error:
File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
log.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
successfully."
-SJ
"John Bell" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi
> Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
> is any additional information in them?
> It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> John
> "SJ" wrote:
|||Hi SJ
Check out:
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...7357de5278e8bd
John
"SJ" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Here is the error:
> File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
> restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
> log.
> Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
> Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
> successfully."
> -SJ
> "John Bell" wrote:
a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
avoid this scenario?
-SJ
Hi
Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
is any additional information in them?
It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
John
"SJ" wrote:
> A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> avoid this scenario?
> --
> -SJ
|||Here is the error:
File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
log.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
successfully."
-SJ
"John Bell" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi
> Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
> is any additional information in them?
> It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> John
> "SJ" wrote:
|||Hi SJ
Check out:
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...7357de5278e8bd
John
"SJ" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Here is the error:
> File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
> restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
> log.
> Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
> Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
> successfully."
> -SJ
> "John Bell" wrote:
Database Status = Loading
A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
avoid this scenario?
--
-SJHi
Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
is any additional information in them?
It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
John
"SJ" wrote:
> A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> avoid this scenario?
> --
> -SJ|||Here is the error:
File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
log.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
successfully."
-SJ
"John Bell" wrote:
> Hi
> Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
> is any additional information in them?
> It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> John
> "SJ" wrote:
> > A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> > a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> > using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> > completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> > enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> > command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> > basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> > did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> > avoid this scenario?
> >
> > --
> > -SJ|||Hi SJ
Check out:
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.clients/browse_frm/thread/b5447588fe32acf0/527357de5278e8bd#527357de5278e8bd
John
"SJ" wrote:
> Here is the error:
> File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
> restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
> log.
> Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
> Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
> successfully."
> -SJ
> "John Bell" wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
> > is any additional information in them?
> >
> > It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> >
> > John
> >
> > "SJ" wrote:
> >
> > > A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> > > a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> > > using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> > > completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> > > enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> > > command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> > > basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> > > did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> > > avoid this scenario?
> > >
> > > --
> > > -SJ
a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
avoid this scenario?
--
-SJHi
Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
is any additional information in them?
It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
John
"SJ" wrote:
> A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> avoid this scenario?
> --
> -SJ|||Here is the error:
File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
log.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
successfully."
-SJ
"John Bell" wrote:
> Hi
> Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
> is any additional information in them?
> It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> John
> "SJ" wrote:
> > A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> > a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> > using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> > completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> > enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> > command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> > basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> > did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> > avoid this scenario?
> >
> > --
> > -SJ|||Hi SJ
Check out:
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.clients/browse_frm/thread/b5447588fe32acf0/527357de5278e8bd#527357de5278e8bd
John
"SJ" wrote:
> Here is the error:
> File '<logical file name>' was only partially restored by a database or file
> restore. The entire file must be successfully restored before applying the
> log.
> Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
> Enterprise manager told me "Restore of database '<databasename>' completed
> successfully."
> -SJ
> "John Bell" wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Have you checked the SQL Server log and the System Event log to see if there
> > is any additional information in them?
> >
> > It is usually a good idea to post the exact error numbers and messages.
> >
> > John
> >
> > "SJ" wrote:
> >
> > > A coworker is repeatedly experiencing problems restoring database backups on
> > > a new sql virtual server (clustered). He has restored a database backup
> > > using enterprise manager. Enterprise manager told him that the restore has
> > > completed without giving any errors. We can not access the database and
> > > enterprise manager shows the status of the database as "Loading". I ran the
> > > command RESTORE DATABASE <databasename> WITH RECOVERY and received an error
> > > basically saying that the database was not completely loaded or the restore
> > > did not complete. Can anyone tell me what the problem is or tell me how to
> > > avoid this scenario?
> > >
> > > --
> > > -SJ
Database state loading after restore.
Hi,
I have sql server 2000 running on windows 2003 clusters. While i
tried to restore the database i got the message that The restore
operation was successful. But still the database is showing state
"Loading."
I restored the database with recovery (Leave database opeational in
EM). I kept the database for a day and it shows still status as
"Loading".
Any help for this is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Jay
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!Are you sure it is not only a refers issue in EM? Did you try below:
RESTORE DATABASE dbname WITH RECOVERY
And if you try above, what messages do you get?
Also, if you open QA and say "USE dbname", any errors?
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at: http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"Jigar Patel" <jigar_pcs@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:uCLjUt4rDHA.2828@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have sql server 2000 running on windows 2003 clusters. While i
> tried to restore the database i got the message that The restore
> operation was successful. But still the database is showing state
> "Loading."
> I restored the database with recovery (Leave database opeational in
> EM). I kept the database for a day and it shows still status as
> "Loading".
> Any help for this is highly appreciated.
> Regards,
> Jay
>
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!|||I am sure as i have done this operation for atleast 15 times as of now.
I tried everything.
When i try to use
Use Database
Go
The message comes saying the database is still loading is not available.
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!|||So what errors/messages do you get from the below command?
RESTORE DATABASE dbname WITH RECOVERY
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at: http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"Jigar Patel" <jigar_pcs@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:uovOaN7rDHA.2360@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I am sure as i have done this operation for atleast 15 times as of now.
> I tried everything.
> When i try to use
> Use Database
> Go
> The message comes saying the database is still loading is not available.
>
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
I have sql server 2000 running on windows 2003 clusters. While i
tried to restore the database i got the message that The restore
operation was successful. But still the database is showing state
"Loading."
I restored the database with recovery (Leave database opeational in
EM). I kept the database for a day and it shows still status as
"Loading".
Any help for this is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Jay
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!Are you sure it is not only a refers issue in EM? Did you try below:
RESTORE DATABASE dbname WITH RECOVERY
And if you try above, what messages do you get?
Also, if you open QA and say "USE dbname", any errors?
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at: http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"Jigar Patel" <jigar_pcs@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:uCLjUt4rDHA.2828@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have sql server 2000 running on windows 2003 clusters. While i
> tried to restore the database i got the message that The restore
> operation was successful. But still the database is showing state
> "Loading."
> I restored the database with recovery (Leave database opeational in
> EM). I kept the database for a day and it shows still status as
> "Loading".
> Any help for this is highly appreciated.
> Regards,
> Jay
>
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!|||I am sure as i have done this operation for atleast 15 times as of now.
I tried everything.
When i try to use
Use Database
Go
The message comes saying the database is still loading is not available.
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!|||So what errors/messages do you get from the below command?
RESTORE DATABASE dbname WITH RECOVERY
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at: http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"Jigar Patel" <jigar_pcs@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:uovOaN7rDHA.2360@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I am sure as i have done this operation for atleast 15 times as of now.
> I tried everything.
> When i try to use
> Use Database
> Go
> The message comes saying the database is still loading is not available.
>
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Database snapshot
I drop and recreate a database snapshot for reporting purposes at the end of a DW loading process.
I need to create some indexes to improve query performance.
Where I should create the index, on the originale db or on the snapshot db ?
Cosimo
If I remember from an article, you can not do this on a snapshot database. So I guess you should do this on the source DB. Please check it though.|||SOLVED
I create the index on the source db.
Monday, March 19, 2012
Database says loading, cannot use it
An attempt to restore database left the database in a loading status. Still have backup and would like to restore, but cannot get database out of loading status. Get message that database is inaccessible and cannot be edited until load is complete. I have tried bouncing the server. Also tried restore with recovery.If you can't drop the database because of the state, open Query Analyzer and
try:
USE MASTER
GO
EXEC sp_configure 'allow updates', 1
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
UPDATE sysdatabases SET status = 32768
WHERE name = 'db_name'
GO
Restart SQL Server, reconnect using Query Analyzer
USE MASTER
GO
DROP DATABASE db_name
If that doesn't work, repeat but changing status = 0
Then free up disk space, or whatever you need to do, and try to RESTORE
again (maybe you can allocate this restore to a different drive, if space is
the issue).
--
Aaron Bertrand
SQL Server MVP
http://www.aspfaq.com/
"bscottparis" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BD86FF00-33A2-4147-8B01-688F577190E9@.microsoft.com...
> An attempt to restore database left the database in a loading status.
Still have backup and would like to restore, but cannot get database out of
loading status. Get message that database is inaccessible and cannot be
edited until load is complete. I have tried bouncing the server. Also
tried restore with recovery.
try:
USE MASTER
GO
EXEC sp_configure 'allow updates', 1
RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE
GO
UPDATE sysdatabases SET status = 32768
WHERE name = 'db_name'
GO
Restart SQL Server, reconnect using Query Analyzer
USE MASTER
GO
DROP DATABASE db_name
If that doesn't work, repeat but changing status = 0
Then free up disk space, or whatever you need to do, and try to RESTORE
again (maybe you can allocate this restore to a different drive, if space is
the issue).
--
Aaron Bertrand
SQL Server MVP
http://www.aspfaq.com/
"bscottparis" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BD86FF00-33A2-4147-8B01-688F577190E9@.microsoft.com...
> An attempt to restore database left the database in a loading status.
Still have backup and would like to restore, but cannot get database out of
loading status. Get message that database is inaccessible and cannot be
edited until load is complete. I have tried bouncing the server. Also
tried restore with recovery.
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Database reindex
I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i can
do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
Any ideasHi Tracey
Have you checked that the jobs and the job schedule are both enabled? What
does the job history say? Have you got any information in the SQL Server log
or the Windows Event Log at the times these jobs are supposed to run? Have
you tried re-creating the maintenance plan or jobs?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i ca
n
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||TRACEY
If I undestsood you , under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
"TRACEY" <TRACEY@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3F05031E-F96D-484D-83CF-A4F87A9DD259@.microsoft.com...
>I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i
> can
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||That how i set up the job..
under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
morning i see nothing ...no history
I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don't
want to do during activity..
This only happened since SP4 ........
Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
figure out why..
The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separate
file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
remains where it is and the log files.|||Hi Tracey
If there is nothing in the job history is sounds like the schedule is wrong.
If you schedule it for a different time rather than manually run it, can you
see the job starting?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> That how i set up the job..
> under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
> job
> Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
> logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
> morning i see nothing ...no history
> I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don'
t
> want to do during activity..
> This only happened since SP4 ........
> Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
> figure out why..
> The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separa
te
> file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
> X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
> ...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
> remains where it is and the log files.
>
>|||Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days monday
thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
I checked the logs
Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
'SQL1'
Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
2:00:03 AM
[1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i get
100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
how to change it to 90
Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
And do you do master, model,
Well im glad it ran last night...
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
In general you would want to pass 0 to the maintainance plan to re-organise
the indexes using their original value. In any given database you may want t
o
have some indexes with fill factors or 0 or 100 (if the data is static!) and
others with less, therefore resetting the index fill factor across the board
is not necessarily a good thing. If you want to change the fill factor for a
give index use
DBCC DBREINDEX ( 'database.owner.table_name' , index_name, fillfactor )
Analyse the information from DBCC SHOWCONTIG or
sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats instead (SQL 2005) for information on what
indexes are fragmented.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days mond
ay
> thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
> I checked the logs
> Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
> 'SQL1'
> Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
> 2:00:03 AM
> [1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganiz
e
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i ge
t
> 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
> how to change it to 90
> Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
> will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
> And do you do master, model,
> Well im glad it ran last night...
> Thanks|||Took me ages to find the thread.
How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
Any ideas why its reporting 100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split
Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
That will depend on what newsreader client you are using. You can set
Outlook Express to only display message threads that you have participated
in, or you can search the technet discussion groups using (say) your email
address. Here is a link for the thread http://tinyurl.com/y3ntk4
The SQL Maint utility uses a value of 100 for the RebldIdx to specify that
you use the original values as this works on free space and not the
fillfactor. DBCC DBREINDEX uses 0 to maintain the current fill factors. You
can reindex specific indexes using this command to change the fill factor an
d
then use a maintenance plan or your own job to keep it (and all other
indexes) at their own level. Another method to restore the fillfactors would
be to drop and re-create the indexes if you already have scripts that for
their original definions. This would be the case if you use a source code
control system such as Visual Source Safe for you database code.
Having a fill factor of 100% is not necessarily a bad thing, if you have
table that contains very static data you may want to use 100% fill factor,
similarly if the table is being treated as an ISAM structure then a high fil
l
factor may be appropriate if you rarely update existing rows.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Took me ages to find the thread.
> How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganiz
e
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
> Any ideas why its reporting 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split
> Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
> Thanks
plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i can
do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
Any ideasHi Tracey
Have you checked that the jobs and the job schedule are both enabled? What
does the job history say? Have you got any information in the SQL Server log
or the Windows Event Log at the times these jobs are supposed to run? Have
you tried re-creating the maintenance plan or jobs?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i ca
n
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||TRACEY
If I undestsood you , under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
"TRACEY" <TRACEY@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3F05031E-F96D-484D-83CF-A4F87A9DD259@.microsoft.com...
>I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i
> can
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||That how i set up the job..
under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
morning i see nothing ...no history
I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don't
want to do during activity..
This only happened since SP4 ........
Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
figure out why..
The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separate
file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
remains where it is and the log files.|||Hi Tracey
If there is nothing in the job history is sounds like the schedule is wrong.
If you schedule it for a different time rather than manually run it, can you
see the job starting?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> That how i set up the job..
> under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
> job
> Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
> logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
> morning i see nothing ...no history
> I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don'
t
> want to do during activity..
> This only happened since SP4 ........
> Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
> figure out why..
> The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separa
te
> file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
> X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
> ...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
> remains where it is and the log files.
>
>|||Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days monday
thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
I checked the logs
Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
'SQL1'
Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
2:00:03 AM
[1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i get
100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
how to change it to 90
Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
And do you do master, model,
Well im glad it ran last night...
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
In general you would want to pass 0 to the maintainance plan to re-organise
the indexes using their original value. In any given database you may want t
o
have some indexes with fill factors or 0 or 100 (if the data is static!) and
others with less, therefore resetting the index fill factor across the board
is not necessarily a good thing. If you want to change the fill factor for a
give index use
DBCC DBREINDEX ( 'database.owner.table_name' , index_name, fillfactor )
Analyse the information from DBCC SHOWCONTIG or
sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats instead (SQL 2005) for information on what
indexes are fragmented.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days mond
ay
> thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
> I checked the logs
> Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
> 'SQL1'
> Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
> 2:00:03 AM
> [1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganiz
e
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i ge
t
> 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
> how to change it to 90
> Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
> will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
> And do you do master, model,
> Well im glad it ran last night...
> Thanks|||Took me ages to find the thread.
How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
Any ideas why its reporting 100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split
Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
That will depend on what newsreader client you are using. You can set
Outlook Express to only display message threads that you have participated
in, or you can search the technet discussion groups using (say) your email
address. Here is a link for the thread http://tinyurl.com/y3ntk4
The SQL Maint utility uses a value of 100 for the RebldIdx to specify that
you use the original values as this works on free space and not the
fillfactor. DBCC DBREINDEX uses 0 to maintain the current fill factors. You
can reindex specific indexes using this command to change the fill factor an
d
then use a maintenance plan or your own job to keep it (and all other
indexes) at their own level. Another method to restore the fillfactors would
be to drop and re-create the indexes if you already have scripts that for
their original definions. This would be the case if you use a source code
control system such as Visual Source Safe for you database code.
Having a fill factor of 100% is not necessarily a bad thing, if you have
table that contains very static data you may want to use 100% fill factor,
similarly if the table is being treated as an ISAM structure then a high fil
l
factor may be appropriate if you rarely update existing rows.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Took me ages to find the thread.
> How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganiz
e
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
> Any ideas why its reporting 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split
> Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
> Thanks
Database reindex
I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i can
do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
Any ideasHi Tracey
Have you checked that the jobs and the job schedule are both enabled? What
does the job history say? Have you got any information in the SQL Server log
or the Windows Event Log at the times these jobs are supposed to run? Have
you tried re-creating the maintenance plan or jobs?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i can
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||TRACEY
If I undestsood you , under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
"TRACEY" <TRACEY@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3F05031E-F96D-484D-83CF-A4F87A9DD259@.microsoft.com...
>I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i
> can
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||That how i set up the job..
under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
morning i see nothing ...no history
I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don't
want to do during activity..
This only happened since SP4 ........
Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
figure out why..
The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separate
file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
remains where it is and the log files.|||Hi Tracey
If there is nothing in the job history is sounds like the schedule is wrong.
If you schedule it for a different time rather than manually run it, can you
see the job starting?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> That how i set up the job..
> under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
> job
> Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
> logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
> morning i see nothing ...no history
> I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don't
> want to do during activity..
> This only happened since SP4 ........
> Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
> figure out why..
> The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separate
> file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
> X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
> ...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
> remains where it is and the log files.
>
>|||Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days monday
thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
I checked the logs
Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
'SQL1'
Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
2:00:03 AM
[1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i get
100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
how to change it to 90
Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
And do you do master, model,
Well im glad it ran last night...
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
In general you would want to pass 0 to the maintainance plan to re-organise
the indexes using their original value. In any given database you may want to
have some indexes with fill factors or 0 or 100 (if the data is static!) and
others with less, therefore resetting the index fill factor across the board
is not necessarily a good thing. If you want to change the fill factor for a
give index use
DBCC DBREINDEX ( 'database.owner.table_name' , index_name, fillfactor )
Analyse the information from DBCC SHOWCONTIG or
sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats instead (SQL 2005) for information on what
indexes are fragmented.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days monday
> thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
> I checked the logs
> Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
> 'SQL1'
> Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
> 2:00:03 AM
> [1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i get
> 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
> how to change it to 90
> Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
> will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
> And do you do master, model,
> Well im glad it ran last night...
> Thanks|||Took me ages to find the thread.
How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
Any ideas why its reporting 100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split
Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
That will depend on what newsreader client you are using. You can set
Outlook Express to only display message threads that you have participated
in, or you can search the technet discussion groups using (say) your email
address. Here is a link for the thread http://tinyurl.com/y3ntk4
The SQL Maint utility uses a value of 100 for the RebldIdx to specify that
you use the original values as this works on free space and not the
fillfactor. DBCC DBREINDEX uses 0 to maintain the current fill factors. You
can reindex specific indexes using this command to change the fill factor and
then use a maintenance plan or your own job to keep it (and all other
indexes) at their own level. Another method to restore the fillfactors would
be to drop and re-create the indexes if you already have scripts that for
their original definions. This would be the case if you use a source code
control system such as Visual Source Safe for you database code.
Having a fill factor of 100% is not necessarily a bad thing, if you have
table that contains very static data you may want to use 100% fill factor,
similarly if the table is being treated as an ISAM structure then a high fill
factor may be appropriate if you rarely update existing rows.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Took me ages to find the thread.
> How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
> Any ideas why its reporting 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split
> Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
> Thanks
plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i can
do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
Any ideasHi Tracey
Have you checked that the jobs and the job schedule are both enabled? What
does the job history say? Have you got any information in the SQL Server log
or the Windows Event Log at the times these jobs are supposed to run? Have
you tried re-creating the maintenance plan or jobs?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i can
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||TRACEY
If I undestsood you , under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
"TRACEY" <TRACEY@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3F05031E-F96D-484D-83CF-A4F87A9DD259@.microsoft.com...
>I had job set up do to database reindex using database maintenance
> plans...since loading SP4 for sql 2000 these jobs are not running ...i
> can
> do start job and that fine but i need them to run early morning of hours
> Any ideas|||That how i set up the job..
under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
job
Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
morning i see nothing ...no history
I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don't
want to do during activity..
This only happened since SP4 ........
Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
figure out why..
The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separate
file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
remains where it is and the log files.|||Hi Tracey
If there is nothing in the job history is sounds like the schedule is wrong.
If you schedule it for a different time rather than manually run it, can you
see the job starting?
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> That how i set up the job..
> under Optimization Tab choose schedule to create a
> job
> Its enabled...and there nothing in the job history nothing in the sql
> logs...nothing in events...i just got it to fire off at night and then in
> morning i see nothing ...no history
> I can just right click it and boom it starts the index which i really don't
> want to do during activity..
> This only happened since SP4 ........
> Im almost going to write a script to do the dbreindex ...but i like to
> figure out why..
> The only thing we did do was for some of the tables we put these in separate
> file groups (the vendor erp creates temp files for each person called
> X_.owner) so we put these in file groups so i can see when they get large
> ...and when i can then run a utility to clear them out...but the data
> remains where it is and the log files.
>
>|||Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days monday
thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
I checked the logs
Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
'SQL1'
Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
2:00:03 AM
[1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i get
100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
how to change it to 90
Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
And do you do master, model,
Well im glad it ran last night...
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
In general you would want to pass 0 to the maintainance plan to re-organise
the indexes using their original value. In any given database you may want to
have some indexes with fill factors or 0 or 100 (if the data is static!) and
others with less, therefore resetting the index fill factor across the board
is not necessarily a good thing. If you want to change the fill factor for a
give index use
DBCC DBREINDEX ( 'database.owner.table_name' , index_name, fillfactor )
Analyse the information from DBCC SHOWCONTIG or
sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats instead (SQL 2005) for information on what
indexes are fragmented.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Sunday it ran this was the normal day i had it set all the other days monday
> thursday failed....odd but at least it ran last night.
> I checked the logs
> Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged on to SQL Server
> 'SQL1'
> Starting maintenance plan 'Reindex Databases Costpoint' on 10/29/2006
> 2:00:03 AM
> [1] Database DeltekTC: Index Rebuild (leaving 100%% free space)...
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space ....thats why i get
> 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split ha.....
> how to change it to 90
> Do i select the change free space per page percentage to 10%
> will that be DBCC REINDEX 'DB','90'...?
> And do you do master, model,
> Well im glad it ran last night...
> Thanks|||Took me ages to find the thread.
How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
data and index pages
reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
Any ideas why its reporting 100%
That means ever time record insert its going to split
Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
Thanks|||Hi Tracey
That will depend on what newsreader client you are using. You can set
Outlook Express to only display message threads that you have participated
in, or you can search the technet discussion groups using (say) your email
address. Here is a link for the thread http://tinyurl.com/y3ntk4
The SQL Maint utility uses a value of 100 for the RebldIdx to specify that
you use the original values as this works on free space and not the
fillfactor. DBCC DBREINDEX uses 0 to maintain the current fill factors. You
can reindex specific indexes using this command to change the fill factor and
then use a maintenance plan or your own job to keep it (and all other
indexes) at their own level. Another method to restore the fillfactors would
be to drop and re-create the indexes if you already have scripts that for
their original definions. This would be the case if you use a source code
control system such as Visual Source Safe for you database code.
Having a fill factor of 100% is not necessarily a bad thing, if you have
table that contains very static data you may want to use 100% fill factor,
similarly if the table is being treated as an ISAM structure then a high fill
factor may be appropriate if you rarely update existing rows.
John
"TRACEY" wrote:
> Took me ages to find the thread.
> How do you bookmark it so i can go to it.
> I have it set to Database maintenance plan optimizations set to regorganize
> data and index pages
> reorganize pages with the orginal amount of free space
> Any ideas why its reporting 100%
> That means ever time record insert its going to split
> Why is it not taking the default fill factor in the tables.
> Thanks
Friday, February 24, 2012
Database Recovery Problem
Greetings,
I am attempting to restore some databases to a SQL Server
2000 Installation that fell apart after loading SP4 for
Windows 2000. The backups were made using Veritas Backup
Exec 8.6. on a remote backup server. When I do a restore
on my databases Veritas restores all of them to the the
SQL Server and they appear in Enterprise Manager. However
the databases are in a state of loading and I cannot seem
to find a way to take them out of this loading state to
complete the restore to normal operation.
I am new to SQL Server so I am at a loss as to what to do
to rectify this situation.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Joe.If you have restored the databases with norecovery you can
restore database mydb with recovery
to bring it on-line.
If in fact veritas hasn't completed the restore then you
will have to go back to that product.
>"Joe Toth" <jtoth@.cmefcu.org> wrote in message
>news:029d01c34727$da60cee0$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
>> Greetings,
>> I am attempting to restore some databases to a SQL
Server
>> 2000 Installation that fell apart after loading SP4 for
>> Windows 2000. The backups were made using Veritas Backup
>> Exec 8.6. on a remote backup server. When I do a restore
>> on my databases Veritas restores all of them to the the
>> SQL Server and they appear in Enterprise Manager.
However
>> the databases are in a state of loading and I cannot
seem
>> to find a way to take them out of this loading state to
>> complete the restore to normal operation.
>> I am new to SQL Server so I am at a loss as to what to
do
>> to rectify this situation.
>> Thanks in advance for the help.
>> Joe.
>
>.
>|||It's been a few months since I restored from BE, but I
think it's an option when configuring the restore on the
SQL tab. The db is left in this state so you can apply
logs if you need to.
--Scott
>--Original Message--
>Greetings,
>I am attempting to restore some databases to a SQL Server
>2000 Installation that fell apart after loading SP4 for
>Windows 2000. The backups were made using Veritas Backup
>Exec 8.6. on a remote backup server. When I do a restore
>on my databases Veritas restores all of them to the the
>SQL Server and they appear in Enterprise Manager. However
>the databases are in a state of loading and I cannot seem
>to find a way to take them out of this loading state to
>complete the restore to normal operation.
>I am new to SQL Server so I am at a loss as to what to do
>to rectify this situation.
>Thanks in advance for the help.
>Joe.
>.
>
I am attempting to restore some databases to a SQL Server
2000 Installation that fell apart after loading SP4 for
Windows 2000. The backups were made using Veritas Backup
Exec 8.6. on a remote backup server. When I do a restore
on my databases Veritas restores all of them to the the
SQL Server and they appear in Enterprise Manager. However
the databases are in a state of loading and I cannot seem
to find a way to take them out of this loading state to
complete the restore to normal operation.
I am new to SQL Server so I am at a loss as to what to do
to rectify this situation.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Joe.If you have restored the databases with norecovery you can
restore database mydb with recovery
to bring it on-line.
If in fact veritas hasn't completed the restore then you
will have to go back to that product.
>"Joe Toth" <jtoth@.cmefcu.org> wrote in message
>news:029d01c34727$da60cee0$a401280a@.phx.gbl...
>> Greetings,
>> I am attempting to restore some databases to a SQL
Server
>> 2000 Installation that fell apart after loading SP4 for
>> Windows 2000. The backups were made using Veritas Backup
>> Exec 8.6. on a remote backup server. When I do a restore
>> on my databases Veritas restores all of them to the the
>> SQL Server and they appear in Enterprise Manager.
However
>> the databases are in a state of loading and I cannot
seem
>> to find a way to take them out of this loading state to
>> complete the restore to normal operation.
>> I am new to SQL Server so I am at a loss as to what to
do
>> to rectify this situation.
>> Thanks in advance for the help.
>> Joe.
>
>.
>|||It's been a few months since I restored from BE, but I
think it's an option when configuring the restore on the
SQL tab. The db is left in this state so you can apply
logs if you need to.
--Scott
>--Original Message--
>Greetings,
>I am attempting to restore some databases to a SQL Server
>2000 Installation that fell apart after loading SP4 for
>Windows 2000. The backups were made using Veritas Backup
>Exec 8.6. on a remote backup server. When I do a restore
>on my databases Veritas restores all of them to the the
>SQL Server and they appear in Enterprise Manager. However
>the databases are in a state of loading and I cannot seem
>to find a way to take them out of this loading state to
>complete the restore to normal operation.
>I am new to SQL Server so I am at a loss as to what to do
>to rectify this situation.
>Thanks in advance for the help.
>Joe.
>.
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)